zSHARE - 9ICE.EKO BAJE TI RE-ELECT BRF.mp3,PLAY
zSHARE - 9ICE-RE-ELECT BRF MP.mp3,PLAY
The superlative performance of the party under Governor Babatunde Fashola (SAN), has shattered the PDP’s dream,” point out “even not a few members of the PDP are satisfied with Fashola’s performance.
in actual fact, PDP is non-existent in Lagos,” am wondering, how could a non-existent party dream of winning an election in a state like Lagos where the enlightened electorate value performance.
The people of Lagos were not known for playing politics of sentiment , they are the people who will pitch their tent with whoever makes dividends of democracy available to them in the real sense of it.
Electoral reform would go a long way in curbing other forms of electoral fraud ,any Nigerian who has the love of this country will support electoral reform as well as electronics voting in their entirety.
The people of lagos,infact nigeria should commend the leadership of the party under Asiwaju Bola Tinubu for its political ingenuity that made the lagos state and ACN(Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) the pride of the nation now.
thewayforward by Emmanuel John
Welcome to the world of Sport,Art,Culture,Music,True life story and Politic.
Labels
Babalola
(1)
Bishop Samuel Ajayi Crowther (c. 1809 – 31 December 1891)
(1)
by Eso
(1)
Can Babangida enter .
(1)
Day Nigerians in the Diaspora stunned Bankole
(1)
EYO TRADITION AND CARNIVAL
(1)
Federal Character Blessing or curse?
(1)
from 32 nations
(1)
Here is a full list of the 736 players
(1)
History of Lagos Island
(1)
How election tribunals’ judges become billionaires
(1)
June 12: Why Ooni Betrayed MKO Abiola BY OBA SIKIRU ADETONA
(1)
lagos governor raji fashola
(1)
Obasanjo must leave Jonathan alone
(1)
ORIGIN OF EYO
(1)
Oyo Empire(yoruba)
(1)
Plight of Nigerian albinos
(1)
politic
(1)
Presidency: The North has had its fair share –Dokubo-Asari
(1)
RE-ELECT BRF MP.mp3
(1)
that will be taking part in the first Fifa World Cup in South Africa
(1)
Wenger - Cesc's decision has clear the air (football)
(1)
WORLD CUP FINALS TOP SCORERS 1930-2006
(1)
Saturday, October 30, 2010
Sunday, September 5, 2010
Presidency: The North has had its fair share –Dokubo-Asari
The Leader of the Niger Delta Peoples Volunteer Force (NDPVF) and a chieftain and leader of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) in Rivers State, Alhaji Muhajid Dokubo-Asari, went on self exile
during rule of late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua. But he returned to the country when Dr. Goodluck Jonathan took over as the President. In this interview with EMMANUEL ENYINNAYA APPOLOS, he declared that the North has had its fair share of the Presidency and that it is now the turn of his zone, the South-South. Excerpts:
What is your take on zoning?
I think that in any plural or heterogeneous society, there is a need to share political offices among the component units of that nation. I don’t believe that Nigeria is nation. It is an imposition and a fraud. But as long as we continue to maintain this fraud and false edifice called Nigeria, political offices must be shared in a way that every group must have a share in the top political offices in the country. And every group must have access to every institution in the country. Now, if we are talking about zoning, it must be equitable. Nigeria has been independent for 50 years now. In the 50 years, the North-West has produced the following as presidents of the country: Shehu Shagari, Murtala Mohammed, Sani Abacha, Umaru Musa Yar’Adua and Muhamamadu Buhari. That means that the North-West alone has produced five defacto rulers of Nigeria in 50 years. Still in the North, the North-East has produced Tafawa Belewa. The North-Central has produced Yakubu Gowon, Ibrahim Babangida and Abdulsami Abubakar. If you combine it, you will discover that the North alone has produced nine rulers and if considered to what other zones have had in terms of having access to the Presidency, you will see that it is disproportionate. The South-West has produced Olusegun Obasanjo twice and Ernest Shonekan. The South-East has produced Aguiyi Ironsi, while the South-South has produced Goodluck Jonathan. Let’s calculate how many years each of the political zones have occupied the presidential office of the country. So, if must talk about zoning equitably, we should be looking at the South-East and South-South because they have been disadvantaged in the number of years that their people have occupied the office of the president and other top political offices in Nigeria. So, if we are talking of zoning, it should rotate between the South-South and South-East until the number of years that the South-West and North have ruled Nigeria. When that happens, we can then start to rotate the presidency again.
How will you reconcile your position with the agitations from the North that the presidency should return to the North in 2011?
By convention, Goodluck Jonathan should automatically run in 2011 because he is a sitting president. And he has tenure of two terms of four years each. It is laughable to hear somebody say that Jonathan was not elected. Jonathan and the late Yar’Adua were elected as equal candidates on the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) platform, on the same mandate. It is only that the constitution made Yar’Adaua, who was president then, above Jonathan. But they were equal candidates. In fact, Jonathan had more goodwill than Yar’Adua and he brought more votes that made him vice-president to Yar’Adua. Yar’Adua did not bring enough votes to the mandate because Buhari won most of the Northern states. Let me say that nobody zoned the presidency to the North. He who comes to equity must come with a clean hand. The hands of the North in the zoning thing are not clean because they have taken more than their fair share and they should allow others to take their own share to balance it up. Zoning or no zoning, the North can’t stop Jonathan.
But the North is insisting that Jonathan should not run in 2011. Do you support this?
They don’t have the right to ask Jonathan not to run. The constitution allows him to run and by convention, the fact that he is the sitting president gives him more entitlement to run more than any other person.
If Jonathan bows to pressure and does not run, what do you think will become the fate of the South-South?
If Jonathan decides not to run, there are other political parties in the country. The Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), which I am a member, is open to any South-South person to run if Jonathan capitulates, which I think he will not. But if he does, good for us in ACN.
Some people said you have abandoned the Niger Delta struggle because Jonathan is now the president. Is that true?
I don’t know who is saying that and why will anybody say that. Am I occupying any office in Jonathan’s government? Or did you hear that they have given me one of the jetties to be importing fuel that we refine here in Nigeria. Jonathan’s presidency has not solved any problem of our people. Instead, it has compounded our problems. The only thing is that Jonathan’s presidency has solved some of my personal problems. I am moving around Nigeria freely. Yar’Adua wanted to kill me. He chased me out town, killed my people. But Jonathan cannot kill me. I am moving freely, jumping from one place to another, looking for the good things of life. That is the only thing I can say he has solved for me. Apart of from that, he has done nothing. Even the diluted, watered-down Niger Delta technical committee report, Jonathan is too afraid to accept the White Paper and implement the report because he does not want to offend some people.
How close are you to Jonathan now?
I am not close to Jonathan at all now.
Why?
I don’t know. Our father, Governor Melford Okilo, then when he sees you he will say this man is a very dangerful man. So, when a man becomes a king, he becomes a very dangerful man and you have to avoid him. So, a president has all the powers, especially in a fraudulent country like Nigeria where everything goes. So you have to be careful. Jonathan, though he is my brother, he is now president, so I must accord him that respect. I don’t need to see Jonathan before I survive because I have been surviving. For me, the only joy I have is that when I see those who used to think that me, an Ijaw man that I am a rag and foot mat, when I see them prostrate for an Ijaw man like me, it gives me that sense of satisfaction. I say chai, e sweet o, so na Ijaw man dem dey do dis thing to? That is it. Apart from that, there is nothing.
It is about one year now that the amnesty programme has been on. Has progress been made?
I am not part of the amnesty and I am not a criminal.
But is the amnesty working?
How can you ask me of something I don’t know? I am not part of the amnesty. But if I will have to give a word of advice to those who took amnesty, I will remind them that they have an opportunity. They are not working but they are paid N65,000 and they want to train them. So my advice to them is that they should take the opportunity and use it very well. I know that the man handling the amnesty programme is capable of handling it if he is allowed to do it because I have a one on one relationship with him and I know what he can do. So, it is the best opportunity for those who took amnesty to revamp their lives because opportunity does not come always. Today, it is available. Tomorrow, if Jonathan is no longer there, it might not be available. That is the truth. Yar’Adua did not do the amnesty because he loved Niger Delta. He did it grudgingly. And if Jonathan cancels it, they will say it is our brother that cancelled it. So, it is good for them to take the opportunity instead of rioting today, tomorrow they beat up somebody. If they continue doing that, somebody will wake up one day and say there is no amnesty. I know that if Jonathan is not there and another person comes, they will not implement the amnesty programme where some people will be paid N65,000 while graduates are roaming the streets looking for jobs. Even some graduates in public service don’t earn up to N30,000 monthly while somebody who is not working is paid N65,000 because he said he is a militant. So, it is an opportunity for them, so they should use it well.
Are you going to use your structure, which is at the grassroot, to support Jonathan in 2011?
That is a decision Ijaw people will have to take. I am a member of Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN). That is the party I belong and I am a good party man and my party members trust me and I will not like to be a black leg in my party.
Outside the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the ACN, as an Ijaw leader, will you use your Ijaw platform to support Jonathan in 2011?
I don’t know what you want me to tell you. But it will be very wrong for me, being a member of the ACN, to do anything contrary to what my party wants me to do. But members of my Ijaw organisations are not my slaves. I don’t own them. They are free to decide and do whatever they believe is best for our people.
Now that things are like this, have you left the struggle?
I can’t leave the struggle because the struggle for the people of Niger Delta is my life. So I can never leave the struggle.
Nigeria will be 50 in October, do you think the desired independence has really been achieved?
As far as I am concerned, I don’t know if anybody is independent. I am an Ijaw man and I know that Ijaw nation has been independent. Rather, it is under a very primitive, cruel and evil occupation of the Nigerian state. For that, I know that we, the Ijaw people, must fight to free ourselves. But for Nigeria, I have not seen any development and I don’t think there will be any development.
CULLED from NIGERIA COMPASS
during rule of late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua. But he returned to the country when Dr. Goodluck Jonathan took over as the President. In this interview with EMMANUEL ENYINNAYA APPOLOS, he declared that the North has had its fair share of the Presidency and that it is now the turn of his zone, the South-South. Excerpts:
What is your take on zoning?
I think that in any plural or heterogeneous society, there is a need to share political offices among the component units of that nation. I don’t believe that Nigeria is nation. It is an imposition and a fraud. But as long as we continue to maintain this fraud and false edifice called Nigeria, political offices must be shared in a way that every group must have a share in the top political offices in the country. And every group must have access to every institution in the country. Now, if we are talking about zoning, it must be equitable. Nigeria has been independent for 50 years now. In the 50 years, the North-West has produced the following as presidents of the country: Shehu Shagari, Murtala Mohammed, Sani Abacha, Umaru Musa Yar’Adua and Muhamamadu Buhari. That means that the North-West alone has produced five defacto rulers of Nigeria in 50 years. Still in the North, the North-East has produced Tafawa Belewa. The North-Central has produced Yakubu Gowon, Ibrahim Babangida and Abdulsami Abubakar. If you combine it, you will discover that the North alone has produced nine rulers and if considered to what other zones have had in terms of having access to the Presidency, you will see that it is disproportionate. The South-West has produced Olusegun Obasanjo twice and Ernest Shonekan. The South-East has produced Aguiyi Ironsi, while the South-South has produced Goodluck Jonathan. Let’s calculate how many years each of the political zones have occupied the presidential office of the country. So, if must talk about zoning equitably, we should be looking at the South-East and South-South because they have been disadvantaged in the number of years that their people have occupied the office of the president and other top political offices in Nigeria. So, if we are talking of zoning, it should rotate between the South-South and South-East until the number of years that the South-West and North have ruled Nigeria. When that happens, we can then start to rotate the presidency again.
How will you reconcile your position with the agitations from the North that the presidency should return to the North in 2011?
By convention, Goodluck Jonathan should automatically run in 2011 because he is a sitting president. And he has tenure of two terms of four years each. It is laughable to hear somebody say that Jonathan was not elected. Jonathan and the late Yar’Adua were elected as equal candidates on the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) platform, on the same mandate. It is only that the constitution made Yar’Adaua, who was president then, above Jonathan. But they were equal candidates. In fact, Jonathan had more goodwill than Yar’Adua and he brought more votes that made him vice-president to Yar’Adua. Yar’Adua did not bring enough votes to the mandate because Buhari won most of the Northern states. Let me say that nobody zoned the presidency to the North. He who comes to equity must come with a clean hand. The hands of the North in the zoning thing are not clean because they have taken more than their fair share and they should allow others to take their own share to balance it up. Zoning or no zoning, the North can’t stop Jonathan.
But the North is insisting that Jonathan should not run in 2011. Do you support this?
They don’t have the right to ask Jonathan not to run. The constitution allows him to run and by convention, the fact that he is the sitting president gives him more entitlement to run more than any other person.
If Jonathan bows to pressure and does not run, what do you think will become the fate of the South-South?
If Jonathan decides not to run, there are other political parties in the country. The Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), which I am a member, is open to any South-South person to run if Jonathan capitulates, which I think he will not. But if he does, good for us in ACN.
Some people said you have abandoned the Niger Delta struggle because Jonathan is now the president. Is that true?
I don’t know who is saying that and why will anybody say that. Am I occupying any office in Jonathan’s government? Or did you hear that they have given me one of the jetties to be importing fuel that we refine here in Nigeria. Jonathan’s presidency has not solved any problem of our people. Instead, it has compounded our problems. The only thing is that Jonathan’s presidency has solved some of my personal problems. I am moving around Nigeria freely. Yar’Adua wanted to kill me. He chased me out town, killed my people. But Jonathan cannot kill me. I am moving freely, jumping from one place to another, looking for the good things of life. That is the only thing I can say he has solved for me. Apart of from that, he has done nothing. Even the diluted, watered-down Niger Delta technical committee report, Jonathan is too afraid to accept the White Paper and implement the report because he does not want to offend some people.
How close are you to Jonathan now?
I am not close to Jonathan at all now.
Why?
I don’t know. Our father, Governor Melford Okilo, then when he sees you he will say this man is a very dangerful man. So, when a man becomes a king, he becomes a very dangerful man and you have to avoid him. So, a president has all the powers, especially in a fraudulent country like Nigeria where everything goes. So you have to be careful. Jonathan, though he is my brother, he is now president, so I must accord him that respect. I don’t need to see Jonathan before I survive because I have been surviving. For me, the only joy I have is that when I see those who used to think that me, an Ijaw man that I am a rag and foot mat, when I see them prostrate for an Ijaw man like me, it gives me that sense of satisfaction. I say chai, e sweet o, so na Ijaw man dem dey do dis thing to? That is it. Apart from that, there is nothing.
It is about one year now that the amnesty programme has been on. Has progress been made?
I am not part of the amnesty and I am not a criminal.
But is the amnesty working?
How can you ask me of something I don’t know? I am not part of the amnesty. But if I will have to give a word of advice to those who took amnesty, I will remind them that they have an opportunity. They are not working but they are paid N65,000 and they want to train them. So my advice to them is that they should take the opportunity and use it very well. I know that the man handling the amnesty programme is capable of handling it if he is allowed to do it because I have a one on one relationship with him and I know what he can do. So, it is the best opportunity for those who took amnesty to revamp their lives because opportunity does not come always. Today, it is available. Tomorrow, if Jonathan is no longer there, it might not be available. That is the truth. Yar’Adua did not do the amnesty because he loved Niger Delta. He did it grudgingly. And if Jonathan cancels it, they will say it is our brother that cancelled it. So, it is good for them to take the opportunity instead of rioting today, tomorrow they beat up somebody. If they continue doing that, somebody will wake up one day and say there is no amnesty. I know that if Jonathan is not there and another person comes, they will not implement the amnesty programme where some people will be paid N65,000 while graduates are roaming the streets looking for jobs. Even some graduates in public service don’t earn up to N30,000 monthly while somebody who is not working is paid N65,000 because he said he is a militant. So, it is an opportunity for them, so they should use it well.
Are you going to use your structure, which is at the grassroot, to support Jonathan in 2011?
That is a decision Ijaw people will have to take. I am a member of Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN). That is the party I belong and I am a good party man and my party members trust me and I will not like to be a black leg in my party.
Outside the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the ACN, as an Ijaw leader, will you use your Ijaw platform to support Jonathan in 2011?
I don’t know what you want me to tell you. But it will be very wrong for me, being a member of the ACN, to do anything contrary to what my party wants me to do. But members of my Ijaw organisations are not my slaves. I don’t own them. They are free to decide and do whatever they believe is best for our people.
Now that things are like this, have you left the struggle?
I can’t leave the struggle because the struggle for the people of Niger Delta is my life. So I can never leave the struggle.
Nigeria will be 50 in October, do you think the desired independence has really been achieved?
As far as I am concerned, I don’t know if anybody is independent. I am an Ijaw man and I know that Ijaw nation has been independent. Rather, it is under a very primitive, cruel and evil occupation of the Nigerian state. For that, I know that we, the Ijaw people, must fight to free ourselves. But for Nigeria, I have not seen any development and I don’t think there will be any development.
CULLED from NIGERIA COMPASS
Saturday, August 7, 2010
Wenger - Cesc's decision has clear the air (football)
The decision of Cesc Fabregas to stay at Arsenal is a ‘huge lift for everyone', according to Arsène Wenger
On Thursday, the Spanish midfielder trained with his club-mates for the first time since winning the World Cup in July. A day later, he declared his intention to stay at Emirates Stadium despite intense interest from Barcelona. Later that same day in Poland, Wenger outlined the importance of that decision.
"He is our captain, he is our leader," said the Frenchman ahead of Saturday's friendly at Legia Warsaw.
"You could see yesterday in the training session how much a lift it is for everybody who loves Arsenal. When I was at the World Cup I met so many people in South Africa and the first thing I heard was ‘don't let Fabregas go'. That means it is a huge lift for everybody who loves the Club.
"The situation is as it is," Wenger added. "I believe it is important in my job that I do not come out with private conversations I have with the players. That would be unfair.
"But Cesc has come out today to clear the air. It was very important for us that Cesc did that clearly and that we can move on from now.
"We are one week away from the start of the season so just we want to be focused and settled now."
Cesc Fabregas Statement
Cesc Fabregas has today released the following statement:
"Firstly I would like to apologise to all the Arsenal fans for not speaking sooner about my future but I have not known what I was going to do until this moment.
"I cannot deny that joining a club like Barcelona was not an attractive move for me. This was the club where I learnt my football, it is my home town where my friends and family are and a club where I have always dreamed of playing. There are not many players in this world who would not want to play for Barcelona.
"I have had many conversations with Arsène Wenger both in person and over the phone over the last few months and although the content of those conversations will remain private, the conclusion is that Barcelona have had two formal offers rejected by Arsenal.
"I am a professional and I fully understand that it is Arsenal's prerogative not to sell me.
"I owe a lot to the Club, manager and the fans and I will respect their decision and will now concentrate on the new season ahead with Arsenal.
"I can assure all the fans that now the negotiations have ended I will be 100 percent focused on playing for Arsenal.
"I am an Arsenal player and as soon as I step out on to the pitch, that is the only club I will be thinking about.
"I am looking forward to the start of the season and putting this speculation behind me."
Theo Walcott has vowed to “get out there and show people what he can do” this season.
By his own admission the Arsenal striker suffered the biggest disappointment of his career over the summer when he was omitted from England’s squad for the World Cup.
After a head-clearing holiday in America and a solid pre-season, the 21-year-old is now raring to go again. And, apart from missing out on South Africa, Walcott is also motivated by a stop-start campaign in 2009/10.
It’s all going well, I’m all smiles,” he said.
“The full pre-season will definitely help. It was an on-off season last season and it’s difficult to come back from that. I would just get back and I’d get another injury.
“I was in double figures last season with injuries. Maybe last year I was thinking about it too much and I was being a bit too timid in games because I was thinking about injury. This year I’m just going to get out there and show people what I can do. It’s all I can do really.
“Not making the World Cup this year and not playing the last one, even though I didn’t deserve to be there, it’s one of those things - what can I do to improve myself to be there next time?
“There are always disappointments in football, this was my biggest one yet.
“But when I found out about not making the England squad, the Arsenal players were really supportive. The first player I had a text from was Nicholas Bendtner and the manager was very supportive too.
“I was obviously very disappointed not to have made it, but now for the first time in a long time,
I have been able to have a rest and a proper pre-season.
“I am really excited about the season ahead – we were pleased with winning the Emirates Cup last weekend and it’s good to see players like Jack Wilshere coming through and playing so well. It is also exciting to see new players like Marouane Chamakh joining the squad.”
Capello’s decision came as a massive surprise and dominated the back pages for days.
“I had the day off so I was on the golf course and I got the phone call,” said Walcott. "I actually missed Mr Capello’s phone call. But I had a voicemail and I had to phone him back.
“He just said, ‘I’m sorry. I’m not going to bring you to South Africa, but I’ll see you in 2012 for the Euros.’
“I didn’t know what to say at all. He said, ‘have a good break and good luck. I’ll see you soon’. I wished him all the best.
“Obviously I was disappointed but I wanted the lads to do well because I am an England fan as well. I said good luck and that was it.
“I will always respect the manager’s decision. If the boss at Arsenal leaves me out of a game, I am always disappointed and I show that. You can’t be happy when you are not there. I always want to be there, no matter what happens.
“Actually, I did have a tear to be fair with my cousin and my mate.
“Then I played the best golf ever.”
Now, Walcott’s intention is to follow suit for his football club this season.
On Thursday, the Spanish midfielder trained with his club-mates for the first time since winning the World Cup in July. A day later, he declared his intention to stay at Emirates Stadium despite intense interest from Barcelona. Later that same day in Poland, Wenger outlined the importance of that decision.
"He is our captain, he is our leader," said the Frenchman ahead of Saturday's friendly at Legia Warsaw.
"You could see yesterday in the training session how much a lift it is for everybody who loves Arsenal. When I was at the World Cup I met so many people in South Africa and the first thing I heard was ‘don't let Fabregas go'. That means it is a huge lift for everybody who loves the Club.
"The situation is as it is," Wenger added. "I believe it is important in my job that I do not come out with private conversations I have with the players. That would be unfair.
"But Cesc has come out today to clear the air. It was very important for us that Cesc did that clearly and that we can move on from now.
"We are one week away from the start of the season so just we want to be focused and settled now."
Cesc Fabregas Statement
Cesc Fabregas has today released the following statement:
"Firstly I would like to apologise to all the Arsenal fans for not speaking sooner about my future but I have not known what I was going to do until this moment.
"I cannot deny that joining a club like Barcelona was not an attractive move for me. This was the club where I learnt my football, it is my home town where my friends and family are and a club where I have always dreamed of playing. There are not many players in this world who would not want to play for Barcelona.
"I have had many conversations with Arsène Wenger both in person and over the phone over the last few months and although the content of those conversations will remain private, the conclusion is that Barcelona have had two formal offers rejected by Arsenal.
"I am a professional and I fully understand that it is Arsenal's prerogative not to sell me.
"I owe a lot to the Club, manager and the fans and I will respect their decision and will now concentrate on the new season ahead with Arsenal.
"I can assure all the fans that now the negotiations have ended I will be 100 percent focused on playing for Arsenal.
"I am an Arsenal player and as soon as I step out on to the pitch, that is the only club I will be thinking about.
"I am looking forward to the start of the season and putting this speculation behind me."
Theo Walcott has vowed to “get out there and show people what he can do” this season.
By his own admission the Arsenal striker suffered the biggest disappointment of his career over the summer when he was omitted from England’s squad for the World Cup.
After a head-clearing holiday in America and a solid pre-season, the 21-year-old is now raring to go again. And, apart from missing out on South Africa, Walcott is also motivated by a stop-start campaign in 2009/10.
It’s all going well, I’m all smiles,” he said.
“The full pre-season will definitely help. It was an on-off season last season and it’s difficult to come back from that. I would just get back and I’d get another injury.
“I was in double figures last season with injuries. Maybe last year I was thinking about it too much and I was being a bit too timid in games because I was thinking about injury. This year I’m just going to get out there and show people what I can do. It’s all I can do really.
“Not making the World Cup this year and not playing the last one, even though I didn’t deserve to be there, it’s one of those things - what can I do to improve myself to be there next time?
“There are always disappointments in football, this was my biggest one yet.
“But when I found out about not making the England squad, the Arsenal players were really supportive. The first player I had a text from was Nicholas Bendtner and the manager was very supportive too.
“I was obviously very disappointed not to have made it, but now for the first time in a long time,
I have been able to have a rest and a proper pre-season.
“I am really excited about the season ahead – we were pleased with winning the Emirates Cup last weekend and it’s good to see players like Jack Wilshere coming through and playing so well. It is also exciting to see new players like Marouane Chamakh joining the squad.”
Capello’s decision came as a massive surprise and dominated the back pages for days.
“I had the day off so I was on the golf course and I got the phone call,” said Walcott. "I actually missed Mr Capello’s phone call. But I had a voicemail and I had to phone him back.
“He just said, ‘I’m sorry. I’m not going to bring you to South Africa, but I’ll see you in 2012 for the Euros.’
“I didn’t know what to say at all. He said, ‘have a good break and good luck. I’ll see you soon’. I wished him all the best.
“Obviously I was disappointed but I wanted the lads to do well because I am an England fan as well. I said good luck and that was it.
“I will always respect the manager’s decision. If the boss at Arsenal leaves me out of a game, I am always disappointed and I show that. You can’t be happy when you are not there. I always want to be there, no matter what happens.
“Actually, I did have a tear to be fair with my cousin and my mate.
“Then I played the best golf ever.”
Now, Walcott’s intention is to follow suit for his football club this season.
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Day Nigerians in the Diaspora stunned Bankole
SPEAKER Dimeji Bankole had a tough time with Nigerians in the Diaspora, who came from China, United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. ONYEDI OJIABOR reports the stormy session
ABOUT 50 of them came from America, the United Kingdom, Singapore, China and some African countries under the aegis of Nigerians in Diaspora Organisation on a courtesy visit to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Dimeji Bankole.
The July 29 meeting was not however, the usual favour-seeking courtesy visit Nigerians are used to; neither was it organised to give a thump-up to the Speaker for doing a good job.
It was, simply put, a forum for the foreign-based Nigerians, to express misgivings about the spate of corruption allegations in the country. A woman asked why Bankole is still retaining his seat when he is facing allegations of corruption. Bankole struggled not to lose his cool in the face of the tricky question.
Ms. Stella Okereke, a Nigerian resident in America, looked Bankole in the eye and threw the bombshell to the discomfort of not only Bankole but other members of the House. She demanded to know why Bankole had continued to keep his seat when a former speaker of the House, Patricia Etteh, was forced to vacate office for a similar accusation.
Okereke was not done yet. The woman said she watched the events of June 22, 2010, in the House, when 11 lawmakers were suspended for their role in the call for Bankole to step down over corruption allegations.
Her words: “When Patricia Etteh was accused of committing crime against the House, it didn’t take a long while before you people pushed her out. Since what is good for the goose is also good for the gander, we are asking why was Etteh punished when we are having the same thing now. Why are you still retaining your seat when you played a leading role to push Etteh out on allegation of corruption.”
The question might have underscored the depth of concern by Nigerians at home and in the Diaspora over rising cases of corruption in country.
Apart from Okereke, others who spoke at the event organised by the Abike Dabiri-Erewa-led House Committee on Diaspora were Mr. Akin Awofolaji, Mr. Ganiyu Dada and Mr. Jonathan Obaje.
While some members of the group demanded a conclusive investigation of all corruption allegations involving members of the National Assembly others insinuated that Nigerian laws appeared to respect some highly-placed persons, a reason probe into cases involving them were always open ended.
One of them cited the N9 billion capital vote crisis in the House, which led to the suspension of 11 members for their leading role in the issue. The group was also not comfortable with the open display of “excessive wealth by Nigerian politicians often beamed to the outside world by international media networks.
Bankole had initially attempted to rush the programme due to his other engagements, especially the inauguration of the controversial Ota Bridge . But he thought otherwise, apparently due to the barrage of questions directed at him.
He first re-directed the questions, especially Okereke’s query to the chairman, House committee on Ethics and Privileges, Sani Sale Minjibir, whose committee is charged with the responsibility of the House’s self-scrutiny. Minjibir was quick to say that Etteh’s case and the allegation of misuse of N9 billion capital vote were not similar. He said a probe committee, which he was a member of, found Etteh guilty of not following due process.
He said: “The conclusion we reached, which has stood the test of time and adjudged alright by my colleagues, established that the former speaker was the person who was driving the procedures and in all the procedures, due process was not followed.”
Minjibir juxtaposed Etteh’s case with the allegation of mismanagement of N9billion spearheaded by Dino Melaye and said, “When we come to the Melaye case, we must always understand that until proven guilty, one is still innocent. As the ethics committee chairman, I have not taken sides with any party. I don’t attend meetings of any of the sides, and my colleagues know that, as I will do justice.”
He continued: “The Melaye’s case pains me. The rule is that members exhaust internal mechanism dictated by the House rule before anything, but these people did not. However, we are already investigating the issue and there is the presumption of innocence until guilt is established.”
The Kano State born lawmaker added, “I am not anybody’s boy; I will do my work thoroughly.” Whatever that means.
Bankole took over even before Minjibir hanged the microphone and admitted that the House position on Etteh was not a judicial indictment. “I will be as frank as possible” he said.
He added, “For the records, Etteh was never indicted by any court, and was not impeached and remains a former Speaker.” He however pooh-poohed over the allegation of misuse of N9billion capital vote because “the matter is already before the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission” but chose to dwell on the N2.3 billion Peugeot car scandal.
Bankole did not only say that the lawmakers who raised the issue forged the Peugeot price list to give a misleading impression of him, but added that it is curious that the same group of legislators who were behind the car scam allegation made the N9billion allegation.
He said Peugeot Automobile of Nigeria price list of 2006 was superimposed on the 2007 price list, so as to give the public the erroneous impression that the prices were tampered with. “They did not know that Peugeot Automobile Nigeria Limited, which supplied the cars, had their official price list.
“PAN was invited and they came with the actual prices of the cars.
“Why would a member of the House go to the extent of forging documents just to accuse Dimeji Bankole?” he wondered.
“And then the issue of payment into Zenith Bank; we don’t even have an account with Zenith Bank,” he said. The speaker wondered why allegations of corrupt practices spring up whenever the House took decision to probe alleged fraud like the N64 billion airport runway project and the N236 billion Abuja expressway contracts. The visitors, Bankole said, should be mindful of distortions and misinformation about the goings-on in Nigeria , orchestrated to paint the House black.
The speaker said there was no doubt that certain forces who felt threatened by some high profile investigations conducted by the House were persecuting him.
He cited, for instance, that the House under him took steps to stop abuse of public funds and ensured that funds appropriated to projects were accounted for. He specifically mentioned the controversial $16billion power sector probe in 2008, which he said, touched on the toes of some powerful and influential Nigerians and asked “did you expect these people to be happy or sit down and watch?
“Why are these allegations coming up each time we are about to conduct a major probe?” he reiterated rhetorically. Bankole also sought to know why issues were always made out of how much the National Assembly spent and not the “positive outcome” of the work of the legislature. According to him, out of a budget of N4.6trillion passed this year, only about N60bn or 1.3 per cent of it was earmarked for the services of the House.
“If you spend 1.3 per cent to ask questions on how the remaining 98.7% is spent, come on, is that asking for too much”, he queried. Bankole reminded that the visitors that enquiries by the House led to the recovery of over N450 billion in 2007 and N350 billion in 2009. He concluded, “I expect Nigerians to ask what happened to the funds budgeted in previous budgets; but positive things don’t make good news in Nigeria.”
ABOUT 50 of them came from America, the United Kingdom, Singapore, China and some African countries under the aegis of Nigerians in Diaspora Organisation on a courtesy visit to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Dimeji Bankole.
The July 29 meeting was not however, the usual favour-seeking courtesy visit Nigerians are used to; neither was it organised to give a thump-up to the Speaker for doing a good job.
It was, simply put, a forum for the foreign-based Nigerians, to express misgivings about the spate of corruption allegations in the country. A woman asked why Bankole is still retaining his seat when he is facing allegations of corruption. Bankole struggled not to lose his cool in the face of the tricky question.
Ms. Stella Okereke, a Nigerian resident in America, looked Bankole in the eye and threw the bombshell to the discomfort of not only Bankole but other members of the House. She demanded to know why Bankole had continued to keep his seat when a former speaker of the House, Patricia Etteh, was forced to vacate office for a similar accusation.
Okereke was not done yet. The woman said she watched the events of June 22, 2010, in the House, when 11 lawmakers were suspended for their role in the call for Bankole to step down over corruption allegations.
Her words: “When Patricia Etteh was accused of committing crime against the House, it didn’t take a long while before you people pushed her out. Since what is good for the goose is also good for the gander, we are asking why was Etteh punished when we are having the same thing now. Why are you still retaining your seat when you played a leading role to push Etteh out on allegation of corruption.”
The question might have underscored the depth of concern by Nigerians at home and in the Diaspora over rising cases of corruption in country.
Apart from Okereke, others who spoke at the event organised by the Abike Dabiri-Erewa-led House Committee on Diaspora were Mr. Akin Awofolaji, Mr. Ganiyu Dada and Mr. Jonathan Obaje.
While some members of the group demanded a conclusive investigation of all corruption allegations involving members of the National Assembly others insinuated that Nigerian laws appeared to respect some highly-placed persons, a reason probe into cases involving them were always open ended.
One of them cited the N9 billion capital vote crisis in the House, which led to the suspension of 11 members for their leading role in the issue. The group was also not comfortable with the open display of “excessive wealth by Nigerian politicians often beamed to the outside world by international media networks.
Bankole had initially attempted to rush the programme due to his other engagements, especially the inauguration of the controversial Ota Bridge . But he thought otherwise, apparently due to the barrage of questions directed at him.
He first re-directed the questions, especially Okereke’s query to the chairman, House committee on Ethics and Privileges, Sani Sale Minjibir, whose committee is charged with the responsibility of the House’s self-scrutiny. Minjibir was quick to say that Etteh’s case and the allegation of misuse of N9 billion capital vote were not similar. He said a probe committee, which he was a member of, found Etteh guilty of not following due process.
He said: “The conclusion we reached, which has stood the test of time and adjudged alright by my colleagues, established that the former speaker was the person who was driving the procedures and in all the procedures, due process was not followed.”
Minjibir juxtaposed Etteh’s case with the allegation of mismanagement of N9billion spearheaded by Dino Melaye and said, “When we come to the Melaye case, we must always understand that until proven guilty, one is still innocent. As the ethics committee chairman, I have not taken sides with any party. I don’t attend meetings of any of the sides, and my colleagues know that, as I will do justice.”
He continued: “The Melaye’s case pains me. The rule is that members exhaust internal mechanism dictated by the House rule before anything, but these people did not. However, we are already investigating the issue and there is the presumption of innocence until guilt is established.”
The Kano State born lawmaker added, “I am not anybody’s boy; I will do my work thoroughly.” Whatever that means.
Bankole took over even before Minjibir hanged the microphone and admitted that the House position on Etteh was not a judicial indictment. “I will be as frank as possible” he said.
He added, “For the records, Etteh was never indicted by any court, and was not impeached and remains a former Speaker.” He however pooh-poohed over the allegation of misuse of N9billion capital vote because “the matter is already before the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission” but chose to dwell on the N2.3 billion Peugeot car scandal.
Bankole did not only say that the lawmakers who raised the issue forged the Peugeot price list to give a misleading impression of him, but added that it is curious that the same group of legislators who were behind the car scam allegation made the N9billion allegation.
He said Peugeot Automobile of Nigeria price list of 2006 was superimposed on the 2007 price list, so as to give the public the erroneous impression that the prices were tampered with. “They did not know that Peugeot Automobile Nigeria Limited, which supplied the cars, had their official price list.
“PAN was invited and they came with the actual prices of the cars.
“Why would a member of the House go to the extent of forging documents just to accuse Dimeji Bankole?” he wondered.
“And then the issue of payment into Zenith Bank; we don’t even have an account with Zenith Bank,” he said. The speaker wondered why allegations of corrupt practices spring up whenever the House took decision to probe alleged fraud like the N64 billion airport runway project and the N236 billion Abuja expressway contracts. The visitors, Bankole said, should be mindful of distortions and misinformation about the goings-on in Nigeria , orchestrated to paint the House black.
The speaker said there was no doubt that certain forces who felt threatened by some high profile investigations conducted by the House were persecuting him.
He cited, for instance, that the House under him took steps to stop abuse of public funds and ensured that funds appropriated to projects were accounted for. He specifically mentioned the controversial $16billion power sector probe in 2008, which he said, touched on the toes of some powerful and influential Nigerians and asked “did you expect these people to be happy or sit down and watch?
“Why are these allegations coming up each time we are about to conduct a major probe?” he reiterated rhetorically. Bankole also sought to know why issues were always made out of how much the National Assembly spent and not the “positive outcome” of the work of the legislature. According to him, out of a budget of N4.6trillion passed this year, only about N60bn or 1.3 per cent of it was earmarked for the services of the House.
“If you spend 1.3 per cent to ask questions on how the remaining 98.7% is spent, come on, is that asking for too much”, he queried. Bankole reminded that the visitors that enquiries by the House led to the recovery of over N450 billion in 2007 and N350 billion in 2009. He concluded, “I expect Nigerians to ask what happened to the funds budgeted in previous budgets; but positive things don’t make good news in Nigeria.”
The origin of EYO (Adamun-Orisha)
Badagry Market Day, that is known as the "ABO AGBADAEGI",Orisa Ogunran Adimu were originally brought to Lagos by Alase Odu, Chief Olorogun Agan while Elegba Opopo was brought by Segbeni, Chief Olorogun Igbesodi form Benin during the reign of Oba Ado, over 350 years ago. While Orisa Ogunran is a male Adamu on the other hand is a female.
Both Chief Olorogun Agan and Chief Olorogun Igbesodi settled at Oju-Olokun Street, Chief Olorogun Agan towards the mater side and Chief Olorogun Igbesodi at the beginning of Oju-Olokun Street, which is today known as Abegede, where the Elegba Opopo's shrine is installed.
The origin of Adamun-Orisha play according to findings showed that the genesis of Eyo masquerade public performance must be rooted in legend.
It was also gathered that origin of Eyo masquerade could be traced to two areas in the South-west part of the country. While people of Iperu, Ogun State, claim that Eyo masquerade originated from their town, the people Apa coastal area of Badagry also claimed that the masquerade originated from Badagry where Eyo masquerade play used to take place on market days in the olden days. The Badagry origin seems more agreeable.
However, Eyo masquerade parade began on Lagos Island by traders from Badagry long time ago. The point of performance then was known as Oke-Ita which was later found to be the lagoon end of Glover Road, Ikoyi, Lagos. This was the site where successive kings in Lagos and their chiefs used to visit to watch the Adamun-Orisha play in those days.
Further research into origin of Adamun-Orisha play in Lagos revealed that about the middle of 19th century, the then British Governor could not tolerate long absence of those who matter in the running of affairs of Lagos colony who are fond of going for days from Lagos Island to watch Eyo parade in Ikoyi that was by then could take about three days journey. The British Governor complained that absence of concerned officials was serious enough to disrupt the affairs of Lagos colony. Thus, he ordered that the idea of going to Ikoyi should be stopped.
The British Governor’s directive prompted the elders, chiefs and prominent indigenes of Lagos to invite the maskers of Adamun-Orisha from Ikoyi to relocate to Lagos Island and the maskers agreed to the suggestion. Thereafter, they settled on Lagos Island and became part of the people till date. Hence, (from its original appearance in 1750),: the first performance of Adamun-Orisha on Lagos Island took place on February 20th, 1854 and it was staged in memory of late Oba Akitoye of Lagos.
On that day on Lagos Island, the general public of Lagos saw what they never saw before and witnessed the performance with an exceedingly tumultuous turnout which had remained a characteristic of Eyo masquerade parade till today.
Eyo masquerade parade used to last all day long and it is staged as the funeral obsequies of a King or Chief, and in honour and memory of a deceased eminent Lagosian, who had contributed to the progress and development of Lagos during his or her life time. The festival is only staged for this reason.
Eyo masquerade speaks a ventriloqual voice, suggesting that he was not human and also that he represents the spirit of a departed person. The Eyo symbolizes the arrival on earth of the spirit; in view of this believe, when one meet an Eyo and greet him with the words :‘Agogoro Eyo’ , he is expected to respond thus: Mo yo fun e, mo yo funra mi
On the order of events, a full week before the festival (always a Saturday), the ‘senior’ eyo group, the Adimu (identified by a black broad-rimmed hat), goes public with a staff, when this happens it means the event would take place on the following Saturday. Each of the four other ‘important’ ones — Laba (Red), Oniko (yellow), Ologede (Green), Agere (Purple) — in this very order take their turns from Monday to Thursday.
There are also revered special outings like that led by the Olori Omobas, the leader of the Princes currently Prince Michael Omoyele Ajose, a Prince of the royal house of Oba Ologun-kutereof Lagos (1749-1775), who himself was a direct descendant of King Ado, the founder of Lagos dynasty (1630-1669). Prince Ajose is from Igaa Suenu, to which the ancestral home of the current Lagos State governor, Raji Fashola could be traced.
Eyo Festival is unique to Lagos area, and it is widely believed that Eyo is the forerunner of the modern day carnival in Brazil. On Eyo Day, the main highway in the heart of the city (from the end of Carter Bridge to Tinubu Square) is closed to traffic, allowing for procession from Idumota to Iga Idunganran.
Here, the participants all pay homage to the Oba of Lagos. Eyo festival takes place whenever occasion and tradition demand, but it is usually held as the final burial rites for a highly regarded chief. Among the Yoruba, the indigenous religions have largely given way to Christianity and Islam, but the old festivals are still observed. The traditional leaders of the Yoruba are the Obas, who live in palaces and used to govern along with a council of ministers.
The Obas’ position is now mainly honorary, and their chief role is during the observance of the festivals. Yoruba festivals honour their pantheon of gods and mark the installation of a new Oba. The Engungun (“en-GOON-gun”) festival, which honours the ancestors, lasts 24 days.
Each day, a different Engungun in the person of a masked dancer dances through the town, possessed by one of the ancestors. On the last day, a priest goes to the shrine of the ancestors and sacrifices animals, pouring the blood on the shrine. The sacrifices are collected, and they become the food for the feast that follows.
Group of Eyo masquerades‘Agogoro Eyooo” (meaning what a tall an imposing Eyo),“Mo yo fun e, mo yo funra mi”(I, Eyoo Masquerades, rejoice with you for seeing this day and I rejoice with myself), is a statement that normally ring out loud all over Lagos, during the Eyo festival masquerade festival.
Eyo masquerades in their white regalia with different hats made of various colours from the five groups, Adamu Orisa, Laba Ekun, Oniko, Ologede and Agere.
Both Chief Olorogun Agan and Chief Olorogun Igbesodi settled at Oju-Olokun Street, Chief Olorogun Agan towards the mater side and Chief Olorogun Igbesodi at the beginning of Oju-Olokun Street, which is today known as Abegede, where the Elegba Opopo's shrine is installed.
The origin of Adamun-Orisha play according to findings showed that the genesis of Eyo masquerade public performance must be rooted in legend.
It was also gathered that origin of Eyo masquerade could be traced to two areas in the South-west part of the country. While people of Iperu, Ogun State, claim that Eyo masquerade originated from their town, the people Apa coastal area of Badagry also claimed that the masquerade originated from Badagry where Eyo masquerade play used to take place on market days in the olden days. The Badagry origin seems more agreeable.
However, Eyo masquerade parade began on Lagos Island by traders from Badagry long time ago. The point of performance then was known as Oke-Ita which was later found to be the lagoon end of Glover Road, Ikoyi, Lagos. This was the site where successive kings in Lagos and their chiefs used to visit to watch the Adamun-Orisha play in those days.
Further research into origin of Adamun-Orisha play in Lagos revealed that about the middle of 19th century, the then British Governor could not tolerate long absence of those who matter in the running of affairs of Lagos colony who are fond of going for days from Lagos Island to watch Eyo parade in Ikoyi that was by then could take about three days journey. The British Governor complained that absence of concerned officials was serious enough to disrupt the affairs of Lagos colony. Thus, he ordered that the idea of going to Ikoyi should be stopped.
The British Governor’s directive prompted the elders, chiefs and prominent indigenes of Lagos to invite the maskers of Adamun-Orisha from Ikoyi to relocate to Lagos Island and the maskers agreed to the suggestion. Thereafter, they settled on Lagos Island and became part of the people till date. Hence, (from its original appearance in 1750),: the first performance of Adamun-Orisha on Lagos Island took place on February 20th, 1854 and it was staged in memory of late Oba Akitoye of Lagos.
On that day on Lagos Island, the general public of Lagos saw what they never saw before and witnessed the performance with an exceedingly tumultuous turnout which had remained a characteristic of Eyo masquerade parade till today.
Eyo masquerade parade used to last all day long and it is staged as the funeral obsequies of a King or Chief, and in honour and memory of a deceased eminent Lagosian, who had contributed to the progress and development of Lagos during his or her life time. The festival is only staged for this reason.
Eyo masquerade speaks a ventriloqual voice, suggesting that he was not human and also that he represents the spirit of a departed person. The Eyo symbolizes the arrival on earth of the spirit; in view of this believe, when one meet an Eyo and greet him with the words :‘Agogoro Eyo’ , he is expected to respond thus: Mo yo fun e, mo yo funra mi
On the order of events, a full week before the festival (always a Saturday), the ‘senior’ eyo group, the Adimu (identified by a black broad-rimmed hat), goes public with a staff, when this happens it means the event would take place on the following Saturday. Each of the four other ‘important’ ones — Laba (Red), Oniko (yellow), Ologede (Green), Agere (Purple) — in this very order take their turns from Monday to Thursday.
There are also revered special outings like that led by the Olori Omobas, the leader of the Princes currently Prince Michael Omoyele Ajose, a Prince of the royal house of Oba Ologun-kutereof Lagos (1749-1775), who himself was a direct descendant of King Ado, the founder of Lagos dynasty (1630-1669). Prince Ajose is from Igaa Suenu, to which the ancestral home of the current Lagos State governor, Raji Fashola could be traced.
Eyo Festival is unique to Lagos area, and it is widely believed that Eyo is the forerunner of the modern day carnival in Brazil. On Eyo Day, the main highway in the heart of the city (from the end of Carter Bridge to Tinubu Square) is closed to traffic, allowing for procession from Idumota to Iga Idunganran.
Here, the participants all pay homage to the Oba of Lagos. Eyo festival takes place whenever occasion and tradition demand, but it is usually held as the final burial rites for a highly regarded chief. Among the Yoruba, the indigenous religions have largely given way to Christianity and Islam, but the old festivals are still observed. The traditional leaders of the Yoruba are the Obas, who live in palaces and used to govern along with a council of ministers.
The Obas’ position is now mainly honorary, and their chief role is during the observance of the festivals. Yoruba festivals honour their pantheon of gods and mark the installation of a new Oba. The Engungun (“en-GOON-gun”) festival, which honours the ancestors, lasts 24 days.
Each day, a different Engungun in the person of a masked dancer dances through the town, possessed by one of the ancestors. On the last day, a priest goes to the shrine of the ancestors and sacrifices animals, pouring the blood on the shrine. The sacrifices are collected, and they become the food for the feast that follows.
Group of Eyo masquerades‘Agogoro Eyooo” (meaning what a tall an imposing Eyo),“Mo yo fun e, mo yo funra mi”(I, Eyoo Masquerades, rejoice with you for seeing this day and I rejoice with myself), is a statement that normally ring out loud all over Lagos, during the Eyo festival masquerade festival.
Eyo masquerades in their white regalia with different hats made of various colours from the five groups, Adamu Orisa, Laba Ekun, Oniko, Ologede and Agere.
Monday, August 2, 2010
Federal Character Blessing or curse?
Federal Character Blessing or curse?
QUOTA system, federal character and educationally disadvantaged were words envisioned by the proponents of one Nigeria, having taken into consideration the multi-variety of Nigeria’s ethnic groups, religious diversities and sectional divisions. There is no doubt that these words have proved effective in resolving the dichotomy in the development and education of the different regions and have worked to forge a path of unity for the country. But when looked at from the more recent perspective of the debates about zoning, which have pervaded the polity in recent time, these words may appear not only to have lost their relevance but also put great inhibition on standards, competence and quality of human beings.
The federal character policy was entrenched in the 1979 and 1999 constitution of the country with the sole aim of guarding against the monopolisation of public service institutions and agencies by a particular ethnic group or religion, its main dictates being the promotion of national unity and command of national loyalty. Related to the quota system and federal character policy is the educationally disadvantaged states clause, which allows indigenes from certain states to be considered for admission into educational institutions at a grade that is slightly lower than others’. At a point in the life of the country, these provisions were important to ensure equal opportunities and platforms for development among the states of the federating units, since the public service and educational institutions belong to the government, they were made to follow these directives. The policy became popular in the activities of the federal civil service, the military and the federal institutions.
According to the proponents of federal character and quota system, the policy encourages unity among the federating units, as every region and states are represented in public service agencies, this they say gives them a voice in policy formulation and implementation in the country. The case for the concession in admission for certain states that have been called educationally disadvantaged was also to encourage learning and pursuit of academic endeavours by the states which have been discovered to have little passion for such.
Without doubt, quota system and federal character have served the country effectively well, as Barrister Paul Adujie, a passionate advocate of federal character wrote in an opinion, years back, “All states, but especially the educationally disadvantaged states, need special provisions and protections in the admission process in Nigeria’s educational system, especially in higher education and the professions! All Nigerians and Nigeria will be the beneficiaries of such good policy, that encourages the grooming and nurturing of opportunities for every Nigerian from every community in Nigeria, and particular effort should be made, in order that Nigeria does not live anyone behind, economically, socially, educationally and developmentally, this is in our national interest.” He compared federal character to the American’s policy of affirmative action which aimed at encouraging Blacks who had been segregated and discriminated against, to embrace formal education. A strong case was also made for federal character by Barrister Nzeribe Egwim, a gubernatorial aspirant from Imo State.
According to him, federal character is a noble idea that should remain preponderant in the nation’s streams of policies. “The fact that Nigeria is multi-ethnic leaves us with the need for federal character, we need something to unite us, and that is what federal character seeks to do. I am in support of federal character and zoning because you will discover that if the North and the South were to contest for positions in a credible election, the North will continue to get the positions because of their population and that is why we need the federal character policy to stay united,” he averred.
The policy has enjoyed consideration in several spheres of Nigeria’s life, suffice to point out how it has been established in university admissions and federal appointments but it is left to be proven if all ethnic groups and regions have become equal in development, education and social exposure.
Given the propositions that were meant to underpin federal character and quota system, the current debate over the zoning formula of the PDP on the position of the president of the country gives rise to the need to revisit these issues, as the same principle of distributing offices to all the federating units has been cited by supporters of Jonathan presidency in 2011. People have been holding different opinions about whether it will be right to tamper with the PDP’s zoning arrangement for Jonathan to contest. The people from the Niger Delta and in fact other Nigerians have criticised the standpoint of zoning, saying that it discourages merit and shuts doors against qualification. Inasmuch as the attention here is not to make a submission on zoning, it is expedient to prove that federal character and quota system have the same toga with zoning, as they also seek equality of office and opportunity distribution rather than merit. The whole idea of federal character, though a mechanism for unity has negated the principle of merit and roundly affected the morale of the people who are qualified but cannot get access into public service agencies because the quota of their states have been filled. People with skills and abilities that can help in building the nation are annually denied the opportunity to offer their service to fatherland, while places are reserved for states that may not have people of equal skill, qualification or willingness to serve or even fill their quota. A case in point is that of university admissions where slots are reserved for candidates from educationally disadvantaged states, when these slots are not filled as they always are not, they become wasted in that academic year when in actual facts thousands of qualified candidates were denied admission for the fact that they were from ‘educationally advantaged’ states.
According to an admission officer in a federal university who spoke on a condition of anonymity, “the slots we reserve for candidates from the supposed educationally disadvantaged states are always wasted because they still won’t fill their quota. How do you expect to encourage people whose interests are not in education to go to school by leaving spaces for them in universities that are far away? I really think the educationally disadvantaged clause has outlived its usefulness, which state is not disadvantaged now with the skyrocketing increase in school fees and the fact that less people have opportunity to be admitted into federal universities yearly? And if I can talk about quota system in federal employments, there is no way you can achieve that balance because in Nigeria it is who knows who, I know of an indigene of a state who was offered appointment in a paramilitary organization from the slot of another state, in fact cases like this abound, so how can all the states be well represented?.”
The federal character policy was also criticised by Mr. Nnaji David, a political commentator, he stated that“despite its having been in operation for some time, it has not effectively taken care of the imbalance in development and appointments, can you tell me that number of people from all states who are in the military and federal civil service are equal? How many federal permanent secretaries do we have and how many are from your region or mine? See, I think we should not overheat the polity, but federal character is an aberration where there is no federalism. Our federalism is too strong at the centre and too fake to take care of the interest of ethnic minorities and in fact all the divisions. Until we redefine this misnomer system we call federalism, there can be no character in it.”
Having considered the differing opinions about quota system and federal character, the fact remains that the country needs a generally accepted arrangement for opportunity sharing and up till now, the closest to effective means of achieving unity is through the federal character.
It is however, expedient for the government to review the federal character policy and especially the educationally disadvantaged clause and ensure that talents and opportunities are not wasted on the platform of equal opportunity. Suffice to say that merit and quality of experience, records and abilities should be given due recognition in the country far above ethnic, religious or linguistics inclinations.
A nation may not necessarily progress based on how well represented its units are federal employments and ministries but how able and empowered they are in moving the country forward. This brings to the fore the need for the country to recognise the strengths of each of the federating units and explore such for positive ends rather than force quota system on places where people may be redundant.
Written by Moses Alao
QUOTA system, federal character and educationally disadvantaged were words envisioned by the proponents of one Nigeria, having taken into consideration the multi-variety of Nigeria’s ethnic groups, religious diversities and sectional divisions. There is no doubt that these words have proved effective in resolving the dichotomy in the development and education of the different regions and have worked to forge a path of unity for the country. But when looked at from the more recent perspective of the debates about zoning, which have pervaded the polity in recent time, these words may appear not only to have lost their relevance but also put great inhibition on standards, competence and quality of human beings.
The federal character policy was entrenched in the 1979 and 1999 constitution of the country with the sole aim of guarding against the monopolisation of public service institutions and agencies by a particular ethnic group or religion, its main dictates being the promotion of national unity and command of national loyalty. Related to the quota system and federal character policy is the educationally disadvantaged states clause, which allows indigenes from certain states to be considered for admission into educational institutions at a grade that is slightly lower than others’. At a point in the life of the country, these provisions were important to ensure equal opportunities and platforms for development among the states of the federating units, since the public service and educational institutions belong to the government, they were made to follow these directives. The policy became popular in the activities of the federal civil service, the military and the federal institutions.
According to the proponents of federal character and quota system, the policy encourages unity among the federating units, as every region and states are represented in public service agencies, this they say gives them a voice in policy formulation and implementation in the country. The case for the concession in admission for certain states that have been called educationally disadvantaged was also to encourage learning and pursuit of academic endeavours by the states which have been discovered to have little passion for such.
Without doubt, quota system and federal character have served the country effectively well, as Barrister Paul Adujie, a passionate advocate of federal character wrote in an opinion, years back, “All states, but especially the educationally disadvantaged states, need special provisions and protections in the admission process in Nigeria’s educational system, especially in higher education and the professions! All Nigerians and Nigeria will be the beneficiaries of such good policy, that encourages the grooming and nurturing of opportunities for every Nigerian from every community in Nigeria, and particular effort should be made, in order that Nigeria does not live anyone behind, economically, socially, educationally and developmentally, this is in our national interest.” He compared federal character to the American’s policy of affirmative action which aimed at encouraging Blacks who had been segregated and discriminated against, to embrace formal education. A strong case was also made for federal character by Barrister Nzeribe Egwim, a gubernatorial aspirant from Imo State.
According to him, federal character is a noble idea that should remain preponderant in the nation’s streams of policies. “The fact that Nigeria is multi-ethnic leaves us with the need for federal character, we need something to unite us, and that is what federal character seeks to do. I am in support of federal character and zoning because you will discover that if the North and the South were to contest for positions in a credible election, the North will continue to get the positions because of their population and that is why we need the federal character policy to stay united,” he averred.
The policy has enjoyed consideration in several spheres of Nigeria’s life, suffice to point out how it has been established in university admissions and federal appointments but it is left to be proven if all ethnic groups and regions have become equal in development, education and social exposure.
Given the propositions that were meant to underpin federal character and quota system, the current debate over the zoning formula of the PDP on the position of the president of the country gives rise to the need to revisit these issues, as the same principle of distributing offices to all the federating units has been cited by supporters of Jonathan presidency in 2011. People have been holding different opinions about whether it will be right to tamper with the PDP’s zoning arrangement for Jonathan to contest. The people from the Niger Delta and in fact other Nigerians have criticised the standpoint of zoning, saying that it discourages merit and shuts doors against qualification. Inasmuch as the attention here is not to make a submission on zoning, it is expedient to prove that federal character and quota system have the same toga with zoning, as they also seek equality of office and opportunity distribution rather than merit. The whole idea of federal character, though a mechanism for unity has negated the principle of merit and roundly affected the morale of the people who are qualified but cannot get access into public service agencies because the quota of their states have been filled. People with skills and abilities that can help in building the nation are annually denied the opportunity to offer their service to fatherland, while places are reserved for states that may not have people of equal skill, qualification or willingness to serve or even fill their quota. A case in point is that of university admissions where slots are reserved for candidates from educationally disadvantaged states, when these slots are not filled as they always are not, they become wasted in that academic year when in actual facts thousands of qualified candidates were denied admission for the fact that they were from ‘educationally advantaged’ states.
According to an admission officer in a federal university who spoke on a condition of anonymity, “the slots we reserve for candidates from the supposed educationally disadvantaged states are always wasted because they still won’t fill their quota. How do you expect to encourage people whose interests are not in education to go to school by leaving spaces for them in universities that are far away? I really think the educationally disadvantaged clause has outlived its usefulness, which state is not disadvantaged now with the skyrocketing increase in school fees and the fact that less people have opportunity to be admitted into federal universities yearly? And if I can talk about quota system in federal employments, there is no way you can achieve that balance because in Nigeria it is who knows who, I know of an indigene of a state who was offered appointment in a paramilitary organization from the slot of another state, in fact cases like this abound, so how can all the states be well represented?.”
The federal character policy was also criticised by Mr. Nnaji David, a political commentator, he stated that“despite its having been in operation for some time, it has not effectively taken care of the imbalance in development and appointments, can you tell me that number of people from all states who are in the military and federal civil service are equal? How many federal permanent secretaries do we have and how many are from your region or mine? See, I think we should not overheat the polity, but federal character is an aberration where there is no federalism. Our federalism is too strong at the centre and too fake to take care of the interest of ethnic minorities and in fact all the divisions. Until we redefine this misnomer system we call federalism, there can be no character in it.”
Having considered the differing opinions about quota system and federal character, the fact remains that the country needs a generally accepted arrangement for opportunity sharing and up till now, the closest to effective means of achieving unity is through the federal character.
It is however, expedient for the government to review the federal character policy and especially the educationally disadvantaged clause and ensure that talents and opportunities are not wasted on the platform of equal opportunity. Suffice to say that merit and quality of experience, records and abilities should be given due recognition in the country far above ethnic, religious or linguistics inclinations.
A nation may not necessarily progress based on how well represented its units are federal employments and ministries but how able and empowered they are in moving the country forward. This brings to the fore the need for the country to recognise the strengths of each of the federating units and explore such for positive ends rather than force quota system on places where people may be redundant.
Written by Moses Alao
Sunday, July 25, 2010
June 12: Why Ooni Betrayed MKO Abiola BY OBA SIKIRU ADETONA
The Ooni of Ife, Oba Okunade Sijuade’s role in the aftermath of the annulment of the 1993 presidential election is widely thought to have been less than noble. In Awujale, the recently released autobiography of Oba Sikiru Adetona, the Awujale of Ijebuland, Sijuade’s connivance with those who annulled the election is brought into sharp focus.
His position as the most revered traditional ruler in Yorubaland has not innoculated Oba Okunade Sijuade Olubuse 11, the Ooni of Ife, from public scorn. Since 1993, much of the mystique around him has been eroded, largely through the carnage sparked by the controversial annulment of the 1993 presidential election, aka June 12. Oba Sijuade came out of the annulment saga with grave reputational injuries from which he is yet to, and may not, recover, given the decision of Oba Sikiru Kayode Adetona, the Awujale of Ijebuland, to re-invite public attention to Sijuwade’s role in one of the most grotesque episodes in Yoruba and Nigerian history.
The medium chosen by Oba Adetona is Awujale, his recently released autobiography, in which the 11th chapter is dedicated to the annulment and the struggle for the de-annulment of the election won by the late Chief M.K.O Abiola.
In Awujale, Adetona presents what can hardly be described as a worm’s eye view. And in the book, the Ooni does not come out smelling like roses. As one of the most prominent Yoruba traditional rulers, Adetona was regularly invited to meetings with General Ibrahim Babangida, the military president that annulled the election and installed an Interim National Government, ING, headed by Chief Ernest Shonekan.
As the widespread anger provoked by the annulment and Babangida’s ING contraption raged, the former military president hoped to limit the damage to his reputation and that of his government, appealing to leaders from all the country’s geo-political zones, especially the South-West, which felt wounded because of Abiola.
For one of those meetings in Abuja, writes Adetona in Awujale, he arrived on a Thursday. The meeting was to hold the next day. While in his hotel room on the day of arrival, Adetona called the Alaafin of Oyo, Oba Lamidi Adeyemi, to say that there was a need for a meeting of Yoruba traditional rulers, where they could arrive at a common position to be presented at the next day’s meeting with Babangida. Adeyemi agreed. Adetona then suggested that there was also a need to inform the Ooni and asked Adeyemi to accompany him to Sijuwade’s room.
Adeyemi, however, was not keen because of the rivalry, over superiority, between him and the Ooni. Eventually, he gave in. The late Oba Adeyinka Oyekan, Oba of Lagos, was also informed. He agreed that a meeting was required, but refused to accompany them to the Ooni’s suite. However, he said he would support whatever position the meeting adopted.
In the Ooni’s suite, Adetona and Adeyemi met the Ife monarch dining with Alhaji Ado Bayero, Emir of Kano. Another Yoruba monarch, Oba Frederick Aroloye, the Owa of Idanre, writes Adetona, sat in a corner. When the two dining monarchs finished their meals, they went into the Ooni’s room for a discussion, after which the Ooni came out to meet Adetona and Adeyemi.
“When we told the Ooni the purpose of our meeting, he said he had met the Northern Emirs. Their position was the same as ours. We asked how and he said that they wanted a fresh meeting to be called of the Council of State along with us. The Council of State, as enshrined in the constitution, has powers to advise the President,” Adetona writes.
But what the Northern traditional rulers wanted was not exactly what the Yoruba monarchs wanted
“Our mandate from the Yorubas was that the election had been concluded and our son was clearly the winner. So, all we wanted was that they should just simply release the results,” the author explains
Adetona then insisted that if a Council of State meeting was to be called, it should be for the purpose of ensuring that the election was de-annulled and the wish of the people respected. The Ooni agreed. But the Alaafin, writes Adetona, said there was no need for another meeting because the key members of the Council had already expressed their opposition to the annulment.
When Adetona and the Alaafin left the Ooni, they went to discuss seating arrangements for the next day’s meeting with the other Yoruba traditional rulers. Apparently suspicious that the Ooni could switch positions, the monarchs agreed that they would sit in a way that would ensure that the Ife monarch was hemmed between two of them “so as to forestall any wavering of position.”
The planned sitting arrangement was foiled. As the traditional rulers walked into the venue of the meeting, they found seats that bore each attendee’s name. Babangida came in, explained the position of the government and sought reactions from his audience. The first came from Ibrahim Dasuki, then Sultan of Sokoto, who said very little apart from accusing the government of using traditional rulers to quell crises brought upon the nation by the government itself.
He suggested that Babangida should invite members of the Council of State to join the traditional rulers in the discussion of the annulment. The Ooni was the next to speak and presented the position of the Yoruba obas: declaration of Abiola as the winner.
It was something the meeting had not expected. “You could have heard a pin drop,” writes Adetona. Next was Bayero, who expressed no opposition to what the Ooni said, but called for a fresh Council of State meeting. After him spoke the Oba of Benin, who condemned the annulment and rejected calls for a Council of State meeting
The natural rulers continued turning the heat on Babangida. According to Adetona, Gbong Gwon Jos, the late Chief Fom Bot, told the meeting that he could not return to his domain if Babangida did not to de-annul the election, as his subjects had demanded, and asked the former president to find accommodation for him in Abuja. A traditional ruler from the South-East, Adetona writes, was more dramatic, telling Babangida to quit as president. “Please go. Please go,” he shouted.
Then Babangida cut in, explaining that the decision to annul or de-annul was not solely his, but that of the military heirachy. He kept on calling on others to speak, but the obas observed that he was calling only people who sat to his right. The obas sat to his left. This drew a protest from the Alaafin, who Babangida was forced to ask to speak.
The Oyo monarch insisted that another Council of State meeting was needless because the late Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, a member, was out of the country, while some other key members had expressed their disapproval of the annulment in the media. Other traditional rulers told Babangida that he should save the country from a huge crisis by respecting the wishes of Nigerians.
Then, Babangida attempted one more throw of the dice. In a somewhat emotional tone, he told the meeting how close he and Abiola were. His government, he added, had paid Abiola hefty debts owed him by previous regimes. The sum, Babangida said, was about $600million. The scent of money scrambled a particular royal head–the Ooni’s.
“When he heard this piece of information, the Ooni became angry and said something to the effect that if Babangida paid him (Ooni) that much, he would be living on the Island of Capri in Italy,” Adetona writes.
Sijuade then got up to go to the toilet. Adetona followed, spewing criticisms at his fellow oba for going against what the Yoruba traditional rulers had agreed on. After the meeting, watched by Uche Chukwumerije, Information Secretary in the Interim National Government, the Ooni told journalists that he was in support of Babangida’s position that a fresh election should be held and that the obas should return to their domains and tell their people to prepare for the election.
Adetona thought he had not heard Ooni right. “To assure myself that what I heard was true, I invited one of the reporters, who was there when the Ooni was speaking to my room. This was a reporter from The Nigerian Tribune. Fortunately, the Alaafin was with me when the reporter played the tape for us. We were stunned,” the Awujale writes.
From his hotel room, the Ooni called Adetona on the intercom and announced gleefully that he had told the world (through the media) of the Yoruba position. Adetona replied that he was not sure that Sijuwade’s claim was correct. Adetona, accompanied by the Alaafin and the reporter, went over to Sijuade’s room. The Ooni repeated his claim that he presented the Yoruba position to the press.
He was instantly put to shame, when the reporter was asked to play his tape, which contained the opposite of Ooni’s claim. Adetona and the Alaafin then pressured Ooni into granting another interview, restating the position of the Yoruba. He did and the reporter was asked to take the interview to media houses for publication the next day. The interview was published by newspapers the next day, but Chukwumerije had caused the first interview to be used on the network news of the Nigerian Television Authority, NTA.
In the book, the Awujale was unsparing in his attack on former Nigerian leader, Olusegun Obasanjo. He described him as a Judas, “who would betray his people,” who lacks credibility and squandered “the enormous goodwill,” which he carried into office “with a performance that left him with a second term short of tangible achievements.”
Oba Adetona recalled an event on 24 July 2002, the late Abraham Adesanya’s 80th birthday in Ijebu-Igbo, Ogun State, when in a ride with Obasanjo to a makeshift helipad he told Obasanjo how disappointed he had become over Obasanjo’s pussy-footing on the issue of federalism. “This was the dividing line for me in our relationship,” Awujale recalled and Adesanya’s birthday presented an opportunity for him to tell Obasanjo how he felt about him, when they rode together in a Mercedes Benz limousine, with former Ogun governor, Olusegun Osoba, as witness. “It was going to be a short trip but I had something to say and so it had to be said quickly enough while the three of us shared some privacy. I said there was a time when I had trusted Obasanjo so much so that I could swear by his name, but that the trust was now gone. Obasanjo asked why. I answered that Obasanjo was no longer credible.” The Oba recalled further in the book, that at another time when he visited Obasanjo in Aso Rock, Obasanjo revisited their earlier conversation during which he told the Awujale, accusatorily, that he painted him a Judas. Awujale reconfirmed the labeling according to his account.
“I told him that I not only remembered but still maintained that he was a Judas who would betray his people…I had no qualms about speaking plainly to him. In high office, people who surround leaders tend to skirt around the truth,” Awujale wrote.
The Awujale was clearly not impressed by Obasanjo’s tenure as Nigeria’s leader. ‘‘Eight years in office was ample time to put electricity on a very strong footing. Eight years was enough to put down a strong foot against corruption and make a clear difference. Eight years was adequate for orderliness and the rule of law to triumph in every facet of our society. These were the basis upon which I gave my support for the office,” he submitted.
CULLED FROM SAHARA REPORTS NEWS.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)